Skip to Content

Sales and pricing advisory for technical B2B companies

Win the right deals.
At the right price.

I help technical and technology companies turn their expertise into profitable sales: choosing the right customers and the right deals, getting the value of the offer recognised and defending its terms. We start from your real deals, then your team keeps the method.

Arthur Romeijer · Electrical engineer · Solvay Executive MBA · 5 years at AGC

The system

Six levers, one sales system.

A profitable deal is prepared long before the quote and continues after signature. Each lever solves a specific problem; together, they form the way your company sells. We start with the one that is blocking today.

1 · Targeted acquisition

Inbound requests are no longer enough

Open conversations with the customers you have good reasons to serve.

See how to target prospecting

2 · Deal qualification

Your quotes tie up too many experts

Invest sales and engineering time in the deals that justify it.

See how to qualify requests

3 · Convincing offers

Your technical offers do not trigger a decision

Give decision-makers what they need to understand, defend and choose your solution.

See how to make the offer convincing

5 · Autonomous team · Foundation

Too many deals go through you, or a sales hire is coming up

Hand the method over to the team or to a new hire.

See how to hand over the method

6 · Sales steering · Foundation

The pipeline does not help you decide

Decide on deals, resources and profitability based on facts.

See how to steer deals

Several levers apply to you? Describe the situation that takes up most of your time. We will work out together where to start.

I don’t know where to start

Illustrative example

Here is what changes when an offer is designed for the decision.

Before: a page dominated by specifications. After: a decision summary that sets out the customer’s problem, the difference from the alternatives, the value and its assumptions, each party’s commitments and the decision expected. The technical appendices remain available.

Before

Technical offer no. 2026-118 · rev. C

Upgrade of the line 2 control system

1. Scope of the offer

Supply, programming and commissioning of a control system compliant with the specification of 12 March, revision B.

2. Technical specifications

Central unitModular controller, 3 MB memory
Inputs and outputs128 digital, 32 analogue
NetworkIndustrial Ethernet, redundant ring
Drives12 units, fieldbus control
SafetySafety relays, category 3, PL d
Supervision2 stations, 15 overview screens
Cabinet2,000 × 800 × 600 mm, IP54
StandardsEN 60204-1, EN ISO 13849-1
Power supply24 V DC, redundant

3. Bill of materials

42 lines, see appendix A.

4. Lead time

Delivery 14 weeks after receipt of the order and the deposit.

5. Warranty

12 months on parts, excluding labour and travel.

6. Exclusions

Field wiring, civil works, energy isolation, performance tests.

7. Terms

Total price: see page 14. Offer valid for 30 days.

After

Technical offer no. 2026-118 · page 1

Decision summary

  1. The problem

    Your controller is no longer supported: a failure would stop line 2 with no guaranteed repair time.

  2. The difference

    A replacement during the summer shutdown, reusing the existing wiring, rather than a full rebuild or the status quo.

  3. The value and its assumptions

    One day of unplanned downtime costs more than the price gap between the options. Assumption to confirm with your production manager.

  4. The commitments

    What we deliver, what remains your responsibility, and what could change the price: the condition of the wiring found on site.

  5. The decision expected

    Choose option A or B and confirm the shutdown date before the end of the month.

Technical appendices: specifications, bill of materials and drawings (pp. 3–14).

The five headings of this summary are the five questions of the review.

The method

We start from what is happening in your deals.

01

Understand

The priority and the deals concerned.

02

Define

The useful work and its deliverables.

03

Apply

The tools with the team, checking that it uses them.

Depending on the situation, one lever or several are involved.

A written framework

Before we start, I propose a written framework: scope, deliverables, schedule, your involvement and the investment. You know what we will work on and how to judge progress.

Arthur Romeijer

About

Arthur Romeijer

An electrical engineer (UCLouvain), I spent five years at Pulsaart by AGC, from antenna engineering to sales strategy, in the automotive and aerospace industries. I complemented this path with an Executive MBA at Solvay Brussels School.

I have also been on the other side: buying technical solutions at AGC, and today as a board member of Pierre Bleue de Wallonie. This dual experience guides my work: making visible what the decision-maker has to understand, check and defend.

Over 18 months as Business Development & Sales Strategist at Pulsaart by AGC
+10%
margin
×2
customer portfolio
+100%
revenue
These results belong to that context; they are not a promise for your deals.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Yes. We start with the lever that is blocking today.

No, not as a matter of principle. The work focuses first on the rules and how they are used.

Each engagement has a scope and a price set in writing before it starts. The first call and the five-question review are free.

It becomes clear with the scope and is set out in the written framework.

Which lever should we start with?

30 minutes to understand your context. No preparation needed.

Or have an offer reviewed in 5 questions